Mika Brunold vs Mikael Ymer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Jul at 02:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Brunold vs M. Ymer

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Brunold 1 - 0 Ymer
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mika Brunold winning 2 and Mikael Ymer winning 1. The last match between Mika Brunold and Mikael Ymer was at the Troyes Challenger, 01-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Mika Brunold getting the victory 4-6 6-4 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brunold | 1 |
| Ymer | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Troyes Challenger(07-01-25)
M. Brunold vs M. Ymer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,465,685 |
| 57.36% (113-84) | Career Total W/L | 62.42% (294-177) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
M. Brunold vs M. Ymer Match Preview:
- Ymer shows stronger second serve performance with 44.37% of points won recently, compared to Brunold's 41.09%. Does this give Ymer an edge in serve-related games? Likely, yes.
- Ymer also excels in returning, winning 49.17% of opponents' second serve points and 31.15% of first serve returns, outpacing Brunold's 48.03% and 26.32%, respectively.
- Under pressure, Ymer has a slight advantage in breakpoint saving with 54.08% compared to Brunold's 52.69%.
- Ymer boasts a higher win rate over the past year at 70%, while Brunold has a 60.87% win rate.
- Ymer thrives on indoor hard courts with a 68% career win rate but struggles on grass, at 52%. Conversely, Brunold prefers clay courts, with a 59% win rate, and less success on hard courts at 44%.
- Considering the level of competition, Ymer competes mostly in Futures tournaments, winning 90% of his matches, while Brunold plays in Challengers tournaments, winning 57.14%.
- Ymer faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 345.65 compared to Brunold's 383.38, indicating Ymer's exposure to tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Ymer has a significant advantage, winning 71% of these matches versus Brunold's 35% success rate.
- Ymer's breakpoint conversion rate stands at 38.89%, notably better than Brunold's 33.54%, suggesting Ymer's efficiency in capitalizing on key opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent performance metrics, Ymer exhibits a commendable edge in second serve effectiveness and return game proficiency, both pivotal areas in match prediction.
The ability to manage pressure is slightly in Ymer's favor, and this combined with a higher win rate over the past year presents him as a strong contender in this match.
Ymer's experience in facing higher-ranked opponents, coupled with his superior performance in deciding sets, suggests resilience and capacity to outperform in critical moments. Moreover, Ymer's competence on indoor hard surfaces aligns well for the upcoming match scenario.
Overall, Ymer's blend of strategic play and performance across key match scenarios points to him as the likely winner in this upcoming clash against Brunold.
Mika Brunold vs Mikael Ymer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Brunold vs M. Ymer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:18:19 | Average Match Time | 2:18:19 |
| 67% (38/57) | 1st Serve % | 56% (44/79) |
| 68% (26/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (31/44) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (36/79) | Return Points Win % | 37% (21/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Brunold Recent Matches Played
M. Ymer Recent Matches Played

M. Brunold vs M. Ymer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.36% (113/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.42% (294/177) |
| 56.26% (256/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.69% (668/490) |
| 52.22% (2262/2070) | Games Win/Loss | 52.59% (5763/5195) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.82% (59/38) |
| 58.12% (68/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.44% (110/72) |
| 59.38% (38/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.07% (112/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 52.00% (13/12) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 467 | Aces Total | 987 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 716 | Total Double Faults | 1307 |
| 1:46:19 | Average Match Time | 1:38:16 |
| 428.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 448.01 |
| 60% (8104/13528) | 1st Serve % | 66% (21217/32081) |
| 67% (5404/8104) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (13856/21217) |
| 49% (2677/5424) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5265/10864) |
| 44% (641/1472) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1528/3451) |
| 42% (5709/13654) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13139/31537) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 52.78% (19/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 48.00% (12/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 66.67% (16/8) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Main Tour W/L | 49.18% (60/62) |
| 57.83% (48/35) | Challenger W/L | 67.91% (127/60) |
| 60.19% (65/43) | Futures W/L | 77.92% (60/17) |
| 56% (109/193) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (274/426) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 59% (39/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (64/127) |
| 48% (29/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (111/171) |
| 85% (110/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (263/232) |
| 15% (110/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (263/30) |
| 23% (87/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (208/60) |